TEXT ONLY
nightmist.us
Common Sense
Of Monarchy and Hereditary Succession
Non-Fiction Library   —   Thomas Paine   —   Common Sense

(continued)

Now three thousand years passed away from the Mosaic account of the creation, till the Jews under a national delusion requested a king.  Till then their form of government (except in extraordinary cases, where the Almighty interposed) was a kind of republic administered by a judge and the elders of the tribes.  Kings they had none, and it was held sinful to acknowledge any being under that title but the Lord of Hosts.  And when a man seriously reflects on the idolatrous homage which is paid to the persons of kings, he need not wonder that the Almighty, ever jealous of his honour, should disapprove of a form of government which so impiously invades the prerogative of heaven.

Monarchy is ranked in scripture as one of the sins of the Jews, for which a curse in reserve is denounced against them.  The history of that transaction is worth attending to.

The children of Israel being oppressed by the Midianites, Gideon marched against them with a small army, and victory, through the divine interposition, decided in his favour.  The Jews, elate with success, and attributing it to the generalship of Gideon, proposed making him a king, saying, rule thou over us, thou and thy son and thy son's son.  Here was temptation in its fullest extent; not a kingdom only, but an hereditary one, but Gideon in the piety of his soul replied, I will not rule over you, neither shall my son rule over you, the Lord shall rule over you.  Words need not be more explicit; Gideon doth not decline the honour, but denieth their right to give it; neither doth he compliment them with invented declarations of his thanks, but in the positive style of a prophet charges them with disaffection to their proper Sovereign, the King of Heaven.

7

6 8
axe2@nightmist.us
20060101
COPYRIGHT © 2006, 2008 NIGHTMIST.US, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED